PDF
nan_15331458_2015_38_3_210
Module 14: Clinical & Applied Pharmacology Evidence Guide
Original source file is included in this package; the embedded viewer and full extracted text are available below.
Original PDF Viewer
This embedded PDF preserves figures, tables, images, and layout.
Searchable Extracted Text
Page 1 210 Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society Journal of Infusion Nursing The Art and Science of Infusion Nursing The Art and Science of Infusion Nursing patient's level of kidney function and monitoring for toxicities. Understanding mechanisms through which the pharmacokinetics of medications are altered by kid- ney disease, the common drug classes that require renal drug dose adjustments, and the use of equations used to estimate a patient's kidney function is necessary for evaluating the need for renal drug dosing. PHARMACOKINETICS Pharmacokinetics, or how the body processes a medica- tion, typically is described by the absorption, distribu- tion, metabolism, and elimination of a medication. The degree of absorption of a medication is provided in drug references as the bioavailability. Bioavailability is the percentage of a medication that reaches systemic circu- lation without being altered. Medications given through the IV route have 100% bioavailability. Medications administered by other routes, including topically and orally, typically have less than 100% bioavailability. For instance, for topical lidocaine patches, absorption is approximately 3%. 3 Alendronate, an oral bisphospho- nate commonly prescribed for osteoporosis, has a bio- availability of 0.6%. 3 The distribution of a medication in the body is often represented by the volume of distribution. The volume of distribution is a hypothetical value calculated by dividing the amount of a medication given by the con- centration of the medication in the bloodstream. 4 Medications with large volumes of distribution move out of the bloodstream and into tissue. Medications with smaller volumes of distribution are retained in higher concentrations in the bloodstream. For instance, the volume of distribution of tigecycline is large at 7 to 9 L/kg, indicating that the drug largely distributes into tissues. 5 In comparison, the volume of distribution of gentamicin, a drug that distributes primarily into extra- cellular fluid, is 0.2 to 0.3 L/kg. 3 Metabolism describes how medications are broken down or altered in the body. The liver is commonly involved in metabolizing medications. However, other organs, such as the kidneys, as well as enzymes located in the bloodstream or tissues, may break down medica- tions. The metabolites, or products formed through metabolic pathways, may be inactive or have therapeu- tic effects. Author Affiliation: University of Utah College of Pharmacy, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah. Heather A. Nyman, PharmD, BCPS, is an assistant clinical profes- sor of pharmacotherapy at the University of Utah College of Pharmacy and a clinical pharmacist in Adult Acute Internal Medicine at the University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics in Salt Lake City, Utah. The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Corresponding Author: Heather A. Nyman, PharmD, BCPS, assis- tant professor, clinical, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, and clinical pharmacist, University of Utah Hospital, 30 South 2000 East, Room 4769, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 ( heather.nyman@hsc. utah.edu ). ABSTRACT In patients with diminished kidney function, the pharmacokinetics of many medications are altered. Alterations in absorption, distribution, and metabolism are observed in addition to altered elimination through the kidney. Classes of intrave- nous medications in which dose modifications are frequently required for patients with diminished kidney function include antibiotics, some anticoag- ulants, and chemotherapy agents. Failure to follow renal dose adjustment recommendations can lead to an increased risk of toxicity. Equations fre- quently used to estimate kidney function for the purpose of making renal dose adjustments include the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Key words: Cockcroft-Gault , dose adjustment , kidney , kidney disease , medication , pharmacoki- netics , renal Renal Dosing in High-Risk Populations Heather A. Nyman , PharmD, BCPS DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000102 A n estimated 23 million Americans have chronic kidney disease, and each year many additional patients in acute settings experience acute kidney injury. 1 , 2 Patients with chronic or acute impairments in kid- ney function are at risk of adverse outcomes if medica- tion doses are not adjusted appropriately based on their level of kidney function. In addition, some intravenous (IV) medications can be toxic to the kidneys. Infusion nurses play a role in assessing the appropri- ateness of the dosing of IV medications, based on a Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Page 2 VOLUME 38 | NUMBER 3 | MAY/JUNE 2015 Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society 211 bound to albumin. In severe kidney disease, phenytoin has decreased protein binding. 8 This leads to an increase in the fraction of phenytoin not bound to proteins, and a new equilibrium is established in the bloodstream where free concentrations of phenytoin remain similar but the total concentrations are decreased. Because total phenytoin concentrations are often measured in clinical practice and used to adjust the phenytoin dose, this must be taken into account when interpreting total serum phenytoin concentrations and making dose adjustments in patients with severe kidney disease. Metabolism can be altered in patients with kidney dysfunction. Alterations in hepatic metabolism in both acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease have been demonstrated. 9 , 10 Research is under way to eluci- date the mechanisms through which this occurs. The kidneys also metabolize some medications. For these medications, as kidney function declines, so generally does the kidney's metabolic function. Diminished elimination of renally cleared medica- tions requires dose adjustment to avoid toxicities associ- ated with supratherapeutic drug concentrations. In addition, elevated concentrations of active metabolites can result in toxicity. Meperidine, midazolam, and mor- phine are hepatically metabolized medications that have renally eliminated active metabolites. Normeperidine, an active metabolite of meperidine, can accumulate in kidney dysfunction and cause anxiety, tremors, or sei- zures. 3 Hydroxymidazolam, the active metabolite of midazolam, can cause prolonged sedation in patients with kidney failure. 3 Morphine-6-glucoronide, an active metabolite of morphine, has been implicated in causing central nervous system depression. 11-13 CLASSES OF MEDICATIONS THAT REQUIRE DOSE ADJUSTMENT IN DIMINISHED KIDNEY FUNCTION Many medications require dose adjustment in patients with kidney dysfunction. Broad classes of agents that may require renal dose adjustment and are often given via IV infusion are antibiotics, anticoagulants, and chemotherapy agents. Antibiotics A majority of antibiotics require dose adjustment in patients with kidney dysfunction. For this reason, it's easier to think of the antibiotics that do not require dose adjustment than it is to list the many antibiotics that do ( Table 1 ). For antibiotics that require dose adjustments in kidney dysfunction, recommendations may be to extend the dosing interval, reduce the dose, or both. For example, with daptomycin, the recommendation is for patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30 mL/min Elimination describes the methods through which the medication and, often, metabolites are excreted from the body. Common methods of elimination are in the urine or bile. IMPACT OF KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION ON PHARMACOKINETICS OF MEDICATIONS The impact of kidney dysfunction on the elimination of medications excreted in the urine is the most widely appreciated alteration in pharmacokinetics seen in kid- ney disease. However, kidney dysfunction can also have an impact on the absorption, distribution, and metabo- lism of medications. Recently, investigators reviewed data submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration between 2003 and 2007 for new oral medications. 6 They found that of the medications that were eliminated from the body through nonrenal pathways and had pharmacokinetic data available in patients with kidney disease, 57% had increased exposure in patients with kidney dysfunction, and 26% had such significant increase in exposure that dosage adjustments were rec- ommended in kidney disease. This demonstrates that the pharmacokinetics of medications not cleared by the kidneys can be altered in patients with kidney disease. Oral absorption may be altered in chronic kidney disease for a variety of reasons. Delayed gastric empty- ing is frequently encountered in patients with kidney disease; this does not affect the total amount of a drug absorbed, but it may delay the time to achieve peak drug concentrations. Altered gastric pH, drug interac- tions (particularly the result of drug adsorption to phos- phate binders), and bowel edema associated with vol- ume overload states may decrease absorption of some oral medications. In addition, decreased gut activity of some metabolic enzymes has been described and may lead to increased absorption of other medications. 7 Distribution of drugs may also be altered in chronic kidney disease as the result of changes in protein and tissue binding, as well as changes in total body water. Acidic medications are primarily bound to albumin in the bloodstream. In general, acidic drugs have decreased protein binding in advanced kidney disease. This can result in increased concentrations of free drug and therefore increased distribution out of the bloodstream. Potential causes for decreased protein binding of acidic drugs include uremic toxins competing for binding sites on albumin, conformational changes in albumin in kid- ney failure that affects protein binding, and low albu- min levels that are commonly seen in patients with kidney disease. 8 Phenytoin is the classic example of a drug with altered protein binding in kidney disease. It is highly Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Page 3 212 Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society Journal of Infusion Nursing fluconazole, an antifungal agent. Another antifungal agent, amphotericin B, does not require renal dose adjustment but can cause direct toxicity to the kidney. For this reason, routine monitoring of kidney function during amphotericin B therapy is recommended. In addi- tion, acyclovir and foscarnet may cause nephrotoxicity through deposition of crystals in the kidney. Maintaining adequate hydration during therapy with these agents and monitoring kidney function are recommended. Anticoagulants Anticoagulants that require dose adjustment for reduced kidney function include the low-molecular-weight hep- arins (eg, enoxaparin), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents used with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or around percutaneous coronary interven- tions (eg, tirofiban and eptifibatide), and some of the IV-direct thrombin inhibitors (eg, bivalirudin and lepir- udin), which can be used in patients with heparin- induced thrombocytopenia. Fondaparinux use is con- traindicated when CrCl is < 30 mL/min. 3 Notably, heparin and argatroban do not require renal dose adjustment. 3 Anticoagulants are considered high-risk drugs because of their potential to cause severe bleeding if dosed too high. Studies have found that when glycopro- tein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTEMI are not appropriately dose-reduced for kidney dysfunction, there is an associ- ated increased risk of bleeding. 16 , 17 Therefore, confirm- ing that anticoagulants are dosed appropriately in patients with kidney dysfunction is critical. Monitoring the appropriate coagulation parameter during therapy with anticoagulants is also important. For instance, an anti-Xa level can be monitored to verify that doses of low-molecular-weight heparins are appropriate, and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is fol- lowed to adjust dosing of the direct thrombin inhibitors. Chemotherapy Cisplatin, carboplatin, capecitabine, methotrexate, oxaliplatin, and etoposide are commonly used antineo- plastics that require dose adjustment in patients with kidney function impairment. 3 , 18 Dose reductions of vinorelbine, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and irinote- can have been recommended in patients with CrCl < 10 mL/min or in those requiring hemodialysis. 18 Other Medications Other medications that may be administered by IV infu- sion and require renal dose adjustments include raniti- dine, famotidine, cimetidine, and metoclopramide; all are agents commonly used to treat gastrointestinal conditions. Bisphosphonates are not recommended or to reduce the dosing frequency from dosing once a day to dosing every 48 hours. 14 In contrast, with ceftaroline, the dosing recommendation is to maintain the every-12- hours dosing frequency as kidney function declines but to reduce the dose given if the CrCl is 50 mL/min or less. 15 Levofloxacin is a medication with which both the dose and frequency may need to be adjusted. The rec- ommended dosing of levofloxacin to treat community- acquired pneumonia is 500 mg IV once a day in a patient with CrCl >= 50 mL/min. For patients receiving hemodialysis, the recommended dose of levofloxacin to treat pneumonia is 500 mg IV times 1 dose followed by 250 mg IV every 48 hours. 3 For antibiotics with renal dose adjustments, evaluating kidney function before drug initiation is necessary to ensure that dosing is appropriate for the patient's level of kidney function. Many antibiotics also have the potential to cause acute kidney injury through either direct toxicity to the kidney (eg, aminoglycosides and colistin) or through rare, idiosyncratic adverse events such as acute intersti- tial nephritis, which can be seen with a wide range of antibiotics. Monitoring serum creatinine (SCr) levels during prolonged therapy with these types of agents is recommended to detect toxicity to the kidney. Some antivirals and antifungal agents also require renal dose adjustments. IV antivirals that require dose adjustments are acyclovir, foscarnet, and ganciclovir. Renal dose adjustments are recommended for TABLE 1 Intravenous Antibiotics That Do Not Require Renal Dose Adjustment - Azithromycin - Ceftriaxone - Clindamycin - Cloxacillin - Doxycycline - Erythromycin - Linezolid - Metronidazole - Moxifloxacin - Nafcillin - Oxacillin - Quinupristin/dalfopristin - Rifampin - Tigecycline Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Page 4 VOLUME 38 | NUMBER 3 | MAY/JUNE 2015 Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society 213 The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations provide esti- mates of glomerular filtration. These equations were developed to assist in diagnosing and classifying kidney disease. The primary difference in the performance of the equations is that the CKD-EPI equation is more accurate than the MDRD equation at glomerular filtra- tion rates (GFRs) greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . 25 The majority of laboratories follow the recommenda- tions from kidney organizations to report an estimated GFR whenever a SCr is ordered in adults to facilitate recognition of chronic kidney disease. 23 , 27 Because MDRD- or CKD-EPI-estimated GFR values are readily available to many clinicians, it would be convenient to use the equations for drug dosing. If these equations are used, however, important issues to con- sider are the limited data evaluating the impact of using them for drug dosing, the difference in units between the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations and most drug dos- ing recommendations, and the limited data on the accu- racy of the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations in the elderly. 27 The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations provide esti- mates of kidney function in units of milliliters per min- ute per 1.73 m 2 . This provides an estimate of kidney function normalized to an average body surface area of 1.73 m 2 . These are units that are most convenient for diagnosing and staging kidney disease. Most drug dos- ing recommendations, however, are provided in units of milliliters per minute. It is recommended that if using the MDRD or CKD-EPI equations for drug dosing, that these estimates be converted to units of milliliters per minute for patients who have a body surface area sig- nificantly different from the average value of 1.73 m 2 . 25 Table 2 provides the equation to do this. The convenience of using these automatically reported val- ues for drug dosing is partially offset by the added step are contraindicated in patients with a CrCl < 30 to 35 mL/min. 19 IV-administered bisphosphonates (eg, pamidronate, zoledronic acid, ibandronate) rarely have been associated with acute kidney injury. 20 For these reasons, checking an SCr before bisphosphonate drug infusion is recommended. 3 EQUATIONS USED FOR RENAL DOSE ADJUSTMENTS OF MEDICATIONS As discussed, determining a patient's kidney function is necessary to renally dose many IV medications and to monitor for nephrotoxicity during therapy with some medications. Three equations are commonly used in clinical practice to estimate kidney function in adults: the Cockcroft-Gault (CG); Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, or MDRD; and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, CKD-EPI equations. 21-23 The Schwartz equation is used for pediatric patients. 24 All of the equations commonly used in clinical prac- tice to estimate a patient's kidney function are based on the SCr. Creatinine in the bloodstream comes from the metabolism of creatine in muscle and dietary meat intake. It typically is released into the bloodstream at a relatively constant rate. It is cleared exclusively by the kidneys and is easily measured in blood, making it a convenient marker to use to estimate kidney function. However, creatinine production is directly influenced by an individual patient's muscle mass and dietary pro- tein intake. 25 Patient-specific factors that influence a patient's SCr that are accounted for in the estimating equations include age and gender and, in the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, race. 25 Other patient-specific conditions that affect muscle mass, and therefore creati- nine generation, that are not accounted for in these equations include conditions such as amputation, para- plegia or quadriplegia, vegan diet, or muscle-wasting disease. 25 The CG equation has been used for decades. Most drug dose-adjustment recommendations are based on CrCl, the estimate that is provided by the CG equation. There is a lack of consensus regarding what weight to use when calculating a CG CrCl in obese patients. Using total body weight can result in a gross overestimate of an obese patient's kidney function. For this reason, many clinicians use ideal body weight, adjusted body weight, or lean body weight rather than total body weight. As demonstrated in the example in Figure 1 , the weight used in the CG equation for obese patients has a dramatic impact on the calculated estimate of kidney function. Based on the data available, it appears at this time that the lean body weight provides the most accu- rate estimate of the CrCl for obese patients with a BMI > 40. 26 FIGURE 1 Clinical scenario: impact of weight used in Cockcroft-Gault equation on estimation of kidney function. Abbreviations: SCr, serum creatinine; eCrCl, estimated creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft- Gault equation . Units: weight in kilograms. Adjusted body weight (kg) = ideal body weight + 0.4 x (actual body weight ideal body weight); lean body weight for males (kg) = (9270 x total weight)/(6680 + 216 + body mass index) where body mass index is in units of kilograms per meter squared; lean body weight for females (kg) = (9270 x total body weight) / (8780 + 244 + body mass index), where body mass index is in units of kilograms per meter squared; ideal body weight for males (kg) = 50 kg + 2.3 kg for each inch over 5 feet; ideal body weight for females (kg) = 45.5 kg + 2.3 kg for each inch over 5 feet. Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Page 5 214 Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society Journal of Infusion Nursing risks of potentially under- or overdosing, and the toxic- ity and characteristics of the drug in question. In addition, there are patient populations in which all creatinine-based equations, including the CG, MDRD, and CKD-EPI, would not be expected to perform well. These include patients with very large or very small muscle mass; patients with severe malnutrition, obesity, severe liver disease, skeletal muscle disease that alters muscle mass, paraplegia, or quadriplegia; patients on a strict vegetarian diet; those who are pregnant; or those in whom the SCr is not stable. 25 Options for estimating kidney function in these patients are primarily to obtain a measured CrCl or make decisions about drug dosing based on a careful assessment of the risks of under- or overtreating in the particular clinical situation. Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate Kidney Function Cystatin C is a protein produced by all nucleated cells in the body. New equations to estimate kidney function have been developed based on serum concentrations of cystatin C. 23 Cystatin C-based estimates of kidney func- tion have been found to better predict adverse clinical outcomes than SCr-based estimates. 23 However, the role of these equations in routine patient care and for drug dosing has not been determined. CONCLUSION In patients with diminished kidney function, alterations in absorption, distribution, and metabolism are observed in addition to decreased excretion of renally eliminated medications. Many medications require renal dose adjustments to avoid supratherapeutic drug levels and subsequent toxicities. Classes of IV-administered medications that may require renal dose adjustment include antibiotics, chem- otherapeutic agents, and anticoagulants. Making the appropriate dose adjustment is critical for avoiding under- and overtreatment. The CG equation historically has been the equation most commonly used to calculate an estimate of a patient's kidney function in order to dose-adjust medications with recommended renal dose adjustments. The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations are newer equa- tions that were developed primarily to assist with diag- nosing and staging kidney disease. Because of the ubiq- uitous reporting of estimates of kidney function using these equations, it's convenient to use them for drug dosing. On the basis of the limited data currently avail- able, this seems reasonable for many medications. However, for medications with significant toxicities- such as anticoagulants-and in patients with obesity or for those who are elderly, where there are limited data of converting the reported value to units of milliliters per minute. There are limited data on the impact of using MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for drug dosing. The largest study to date compared the CG equation with the MDRD equation for drug dosing. The study found that CG-based drug dosing agreed with MDRD-based drug dosing for 13 renally adjusted medications 88% to 89% of the time, depending on the weight used in the CG equation. 28 On the basis of these data, it may be reason- able to use MDRD for drug dosing. Because the CKD- EPI equation would be expected to perform similarly to the MDRD equation at lower levels of kidney function where drug dose adjustments are typically made, use of the CKD-EPI equation may also be reasonable. Important caveats for the use of these equations for drug dosing, however, are that there are limited data on the performance of the equations in elderly or obese patients. 27 In these patients, using the CG equation may be most appropriate. When using any kidney function estimating equation to dose medications, it's important to consider that the equations provide estimates only. In 1 study that high- lights this concept, researchers found that the MDRD equation provided an estimate of kidney function that was 30% from a patient's actual GFR only 83% of the time. 29 In the same study, the CG equation provided an estimate of kidney function that was within 30% of the measured GFR 69% of the time. 29 The limited preci- sion of the estimating equations in individual patients underscores the need to take into account the clinical scenario in addition to the estimate of kidney function when determining a drug-dosing regimen. Patient- and situation-specific factors that may be considered when determining if more or less aggressive therapy is war- ranted include the severity of the patient's illness, the TABLE 2 Equation for Converting MDRD or CKD-EPI Equations to Units of Milliliters per Minute for Use in Drug Dosing 25 eGFR (mL/min) = eGFR (mL/min/1.73m 2 ) x body surface area 1.73 m2 Abbreviations: MDRD, modification of diet in renal disease; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Units: body surface area in meters squared. Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Page 6 VOLUME 38 | NUMBER 3 | MAY/JUNE 2015 Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society 215 observations from the PROTECT-TIMI-30 trial . J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 ; 47 ( 12 ): 2374-2379 . 17. Alexander KP , Chen AY , Newby LK , et al. Sex differences in major bleeding with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE (can rapid stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/ AHA guidelines) initiative . Circulation . 2006 ; 114 : 1380-1387 . 18. Janus N , Thariat J , Boulanger H , Deray G , Launay-Vacher V . Proposal for dosage adjustment and timing of chemotherapy in hemodialyzed patients . Ann Oncol. 2010 ; 21 ( 7 ): 1395-1403 . 19. Miller PD , Jamal SA , Evenepoeal P , Eastell R , Boonen S . Renal safety in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a review . J Bone Miner Res. 2013 ; 28 ( 10 ): 2049-2059 . 20. Coleman RE . Risks and benefits of bisphosphonates . Br J Cancer . 2008 ; 98 ( 11 ): 1736-1740 . 21. Cockcroft DW , Gault MH . Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine . Nephron . 1976 ; 16 ( 1 ): 31-41 . 22. Levey AS , Coresh J , Greene T , et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate . Ann Intern Med . 2006 ; 145 ( 4 ): 247-254 . 23. International Society of Nephrology . Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guide- line for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney dis- ease . Kidney Int Suppl . 2013 ; 3 ( 1 ): 1-150 . http://www.kdigo.org/ clinical_practice_guidelines/pdf/CKD/KDIGO_2012_CKD_ GL.pdf . Accessed January 5, 2015. 24. Schwartz GJ , Work DF . Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 ; 4 ( 11 ): 1832-1843 . 25. National Kidney Foundation . Frequently asked questions about GFR estimates . https:// www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/ docs/12-10-4004_abe_faqs_aboutgfrrev1b_singleb.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2014. 26. Demirovic JA , Pai AB , Pai MP . Estimation of creatinine clearance in morbidly obese patients . Am J Health Pharm . 2009 ; 66 ( 7 ): 642-648 . 27. Nyman HA , Dowling TC , Hudson JQ , St. Peter WL , Joy MS , Nolin TD . Comparative evaluation of the Cockcroft-Gault equa- tion and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study equation for drug dosing: an opinion of the nephrology practice and research network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy . Pharmacotherapy . 2011 ; 31 ( 11 ): 1130-1144 . 28. Stevens LA , Nolin TD , Richardson MM , et al. Comparison of drug dosing recommendations based on measured GFR and kid- ney function estimating equations . Am J Kidney Dis . 2009 ; 54 ( 1 ): 33-42 . 29. Stevens LA , Manzi J , Levey AS , et al. Impact of creatinine calibra- tion on performance of GFR estimating equations in a pooled individual patient database . Am J Kidney Dis . 2007 ; 50 ( 1 ): 21-35 . on the performance of these equations, use of the CG equation may be a more appropriate approach. REFERENCES 1. Levey AS , Stevens LA , Schmid CH , et al. A new equation to esti- mate glomerular filtration . Ann Intern Med. 2009 ; 150 ( 9 ): 604-612 . 2. Chertow GM , Burdick E , Honour M , Bonventre JV , Bates DW . Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospi- talized patients . J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 ; 16 ( 11 ): 3365-3370 . 3. Lexi-Comp Online (R) , LexDrugs (R) . Hudson, Ohio : Lexi-Comp, Inc . Accessed April 14, 2014. 4. Janson B , Thursky K . Dosing of antibiotics in obesity . Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012 ; 25 ( 6 ): 634-649 . 5. Tygacil [package insert] . Philadelphia, PA : Pfizer ; 2013 . 6. Zhang Y , Zhang L , Abraham S , et al. Assessment of the impact of renal impairment on systemic exposure of new molecular entities: evaluation of recent new drug applications . Clin Pharmacol Ther . 2009 ; 85 ( 3 ): 305-311 . 7. Naud J , Nolin TD , Leblond FA , Pichette V . Current understand- ing of drug disposition in kidney disease . J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 ; 52 ( suppl 1 ): 10S-22S . 8. Campoy S , Elwell R . Pharmacology & CKD: how chronic kidney disease and its complications alter drug response . Am J Nurs. 2005 ; 105 ( 9 ): 60-71 . 9. Nolin TD , Naud J , Leblond FA , Pichette V . Emerging evidence of the impact of kidney disease on drug metabolism and transport . Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 ; 83 ( 6 ): 898-903 . 10. Kirwan CJ , MacPhee IA , Lee T , Holt DW , Philips BJ . Acute kid- ney injury reduces the hepatic metabolism of midazolam in criti- cally ill patients . Intensive Care Med. 2012 ; 38 ( 1 ): 76-84 . 11. Launay-Vacher V , Karie S , Fau JB , Izzedine H , Deray G . Treatment of pain in patients with renal insufficiency: the World Health Organization three-step ladder adapted . J Pain. 2005 ; 6 ( 3 ): 137-148 . 12. Dean M . Opioids in renal failure and dialysis patients . J Pain Symptom Manage . 2004 ; 28 ( 5 ): 497-504 . 13. Angst MS , Buhrer M , Lotsch J . Insidious intoxication after mor- phine treatment in renal failure: delayed onset of morphine- 6-glucuronide action . Anesthesiology. 2000 ; 92 ( 5 ): 1473-1476 . 14. Cubicin [package insert] . Lexington, MA : Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc ; 2013 . 15. Teflaro [package insert]. St. Louis, MO : Forest Laboratories ; 2013 . 16. Kirtane AJ , Piazza G , Murphy SA , et al. Correlates of bleeding events among moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing percu- taneous coronary intervention and treated with eptifibatide: Copyright (c) 2015 Infusion Nurses Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.